Archive for December, 2009


Compression

When I first started reading about compressors I was hopelessly lost. The terminology was technical in an almost mean-spirited way and I couldn’t make heads or tails of what was being written. To keep things simple, I think of compression as a way of evening out the loud and soft parts of any vocal or instrument so that its behavior is a bit more predictable. In other words, compression brings up the really soft spots and tames the really loud spots so that you’re not constantly reaching for the volume fader on your mixing board (or virtual mixing board on your DAW). In its simplest form, a compressor, whether a hardware unit or a plug-in, will squeeze the audio so that its highs and lows are less pronounced. This allows you to do things like bring down the volume level of the compressed track without fear that its softer parts will get lost, or bring up the volume level without fear that the loud parts will jump out. It might help to think of all compression settings (attack, release, ratio and threshold) as ways to squeeze your audio more or less aggressively. Not enough compression will leave tracks that jump out of a mix at inappropriate times or get lost in the sound of the other instruments; however, too much compression can make a track sound lifeless or uninspired. My rule of thumb is to be less aggressive compressing audio on the way into your DAW (because you’re stuck with whatever you do) and more aggressive with my plug-in compression (because you can always dial it back).

EQ

While a wonderful (and essential) tool, EQ is also quite possibly the quickest way to royally mess up the sound of a mix. Overuse of EQ ranks second only to overuse of reverb as the hallmark of an inexperienced mix engineer. EQ should be used to subtly (or not so subtly) color the sound of the particular track you’re working on so that it relates well to and leaves space for the other tracks in a mix. My experience has been that it’s what you pull out and not what you put in that makes EQ work best. For example, even when you’re looking for a boost in the high frequencies of a track, it’s often more effective to pull a few dB from a lower frequency which, in turn, brightens the sound.

Vocals Vocal Compression on the Way In

Since the vocal (despite what your guitar-playing pals might tell you) is the most important element of any popular music mix, let’s start here. Getting a vocal to sit well in a mix is a combination of compression, EQ and often volume fader automation. It’s a fairly common practice to compress a vocal a little on its way into your DAW. This shouldn’t be an aggressive type of compression but rather just enough to tame some of the loudest spots of a vocal so that your overall recording volume can be hotter.

An approach to the vocal chain in my studio runs as follows: microphone into hardware preamp/compressor and then directly into my DAW. To get into the nitty gritty, I generally set my hardware compressor’s attack settings at around 30ms and release settings at about 1 second and my compression ratio to 3:1. Then, I play with the threshold making sure that at the hottest parts of the vocal, the gain reduction is at a maximum of -3dB. This leaves me room in the mix to compress further using a software compression plug-in. The danger of compressing too aggressively on the way in is that you’ll end up stuck with the sound of the overly compressed vocal with no way of changing it later.

Vocal Compression in the Mix

Once the vocal is in the mix, I go to a plug-in compressor to further help keep the vocal present in the mix without jumping out too much in the loud spots. My recommendation would be to find a compressor that has a smooth, transparent sound that allows you to squeeze the vocal just a little more (approximately -3dB of gain reduction at the loudest spots) so that the vocal maintains it’s presence. I set my attack at 26ms and my release at around 300ms. For more detail, take a peek at my general vocal settings in the screen shots on the right. If the mix is a particularly full one where the voice needs to cut through a bit more and show a little more sparkle, I’ll use a frequency-specific compressor (like the Waves C4 on its “pop vocal” setting) which is a little more specific in terms of which frequencies it chooses to compress. In this case, 40hz, 500hz, 6khz and 16khz. To see exactly how the attack and release settings are set up for each frequency, take a look at the screen shot here below.

Vocal EQ

I rarely, if ever, EQ my vocals on the way in. I prefer to get a good uncolored vocal sound so that when it comes time to mix with the final instrumentation, I have the flexibility to work with the un-EQed vocal audio. This is particularly useful when you start by tracking a vocal against a single instrument like the acoustic guitar but end up mixing it in with a full band. EQ decisions shouldn’t be made in a vacuum. Ultimately it’s the relationship of the voice with all of the other elements in the mix that determines the EQ approach. Often, a vocal EQ that works in a mix won’t sound particularly good when the vocal is soloed. As I mentioned earlier, my preference is to cut the EQ in certain frequencies as opposed to boosting it.

Here are a couple of instances where cutting frequencies can solve common vocal problems:

  • Muddy or Boomy Vocal – In this situation, I tend to pull a dB or two at around 200hz. This also has the effect of making the vocal cut through a mix better or sound brighter.
  • Piercing or Painful Vocal – Here, I’ll pull a few dB at around 3 khz. This tends to take the edge off of the vocal without removing any of the clarity.

Here are a couple of instances where the tasteful boosting of frequencies is useful:

  • Bringing out the low end in a vocal – add 1 or 2db of gain at between 80hz and 100hz
  • Adding Brightness – Occasionally if a vocal sound is just a bit too dark or undefined, I’ll add a few dB of gain at 5khz
  • Adding Air or Breath – Here I’ll use a shelving EQ which boosts all frequencies above 12.5khz

Shelving

In a shelving EQ, a band of frequencies, in either the high or low frequency end of the spectrum, is increased or attenuated by a fixed amount. The term shelving doesn’t usually apply to a mid-range boost or cut.

Acoustic Guitars

While working as an engineer in Nashville, I spent a lot of time miking and recording acoustic guitars. Despite the steadily improving pickup systems being installed in acoustic guitars, I still believe that there is no substitute for a well-placed condenser microphone (or microphones) when it comes to capturing the warmth, body and air of an acoustic guitar. However, as with all acoustic instruments, it’s a challenge to properly sit one in a mix and preserve its texture and character while also blending it with the other instruments. There are a couple of approaches to compression and EQ that will go a long way towards solving this problem.

Acoustic Guitar Compression on the Way In

When compressing acoustic guitar on the way into my DAW, I find it’s better to be a bit more aggressive with attack and release settings than you would with a lead vocal. I’ll use the more of a medium fast attack (approximately 22ms) and release (approximately 500ms) on a hardware compressor with a ratio of 3:1 and then play with the threshold knob until, again, the gain is attenuated by about -3dB.

Acoustic Guitar Compression in the Mix

At this point, it’s a good idea to base your compression settings on the kind of a mix you’re doing. If it’s a simple acoustic guitar and vocal recording, it’s entirely possible to leave off all compression on the acoustic. However, if it’s a full band mix and I want to make sure you can hear the acoustic strumming or finger picking clearly among the other instruments, I’ll use a compression plug-in (like Metric Halo’s Channel Strip) and compress a bit more aggressively: 16ms attack and 160ms release with a ration of 3.5:1. Take a peek at my settings.

Ratio

A compressor reduces an audio signal’s gain (level) if its amplitude exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of gain reduction is determined by a ratio. For example, with a ratio of 4:1, when the input level is 4dB higher than the threshold, the the compressor will process the signal so that the output signal level will be 1dB over the threshold. So the gain (level) has been reduced by 3 dB.

Acoustic Guitar EQ

Very much like vocals, I don’t believe in EQing acoustic guitar while I’m recording it, only because I rarely know what the other elements of the mix will be. However, there are a two very specific approaches I use to EQing an acoustic guitar depending on whether or not it’s accompanying a vocal performance or a part of a bigger mix. In general terms, the EQ approach is more subtle in the simple guitar/vocal to preserve the fuller tone of the acoustic and more aggressive in the full-band mix to make room for other instruments while still preserving the essential elements of the acoustic’s sound.

Here are some EQ settings for a simple acoustic guitar and vocal recording:

  • Removing Boominess – I like to pull 1 or 2 dB at 125hz to remove the boominess that often accompanies miking an acoustic too close to the sound hole.
  • Adding Sparkle – If after removing some of the boominess, I’m still looking for more sparkle in the acoustic, I’ll boost a dB or two at 5khz.

Below are some EQ settings for an acoustic in a full band recording:

  • Adding Clarity – I’ve found that a high-pass filter at 120hz leaves room for the kick drum and bass guitar in a mix while allowing the acoustic to shine at the higher frequencies. Leaving in the low parts of the acoustic’s frequency will often muddy the mix and obscure the kick drum and bass.
  • Still muddy? – don’t be afraid to take your high-pass filter up to 200hz or even 300hz if the guitar still isn’t cutting through the mix. It may sound terrible soloed but perfect in the mix and that’s the key.
  • Adding Sparkle – As above, if cutting out the low frequencies isn’t enough to get the acoustic to cut through a mix, adding two or three dB at 5k will do a lot to bring out the strummed or finger picked strings of the acoustic.

Compression and EQ are two very powerful weapons in your mix arsenal, but as with anything, overuse will do more harm than good. I think back to the words of an engineer whose work I really respect who liked to say “I’ll compress until it sucks and then back it off from there.” In other words, knowing when to say “when” is an equally useful skill. A final thought…as far as signal path is concerned, I tend to place compression after EQ because EQ effectively raises or lowers the volume of the track and I’ve found I get a more effective response from the compressor if I hit it with the EQed audio. I would highly recommend using the above EQ and compression settings not as an ironclad rule but rather as a jumping off point. Every mix is different and your ears will tell you what’s working and what isn’t.

Good luck!

Sarit Bruno manages content and editorial line for Audiofanzine

AudioFanzine offers benchmark testing/reviews of products, software or instruments and articles of a tutorial nature, all of which are systematically illustrated by exclusive videos or audio extracts. Addressing a universal audience, both amateurs and professionals alike, http://Audiofanzine.com addresses musicians as well as sound engineers, home-studio recording enthusiasts, and audio and lighting engineers.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Sarit_Bruno

Further Audio & Related Resources

Who else wants to learn to record voice information products at home?

Now you can easily do it with the packages & video tutorials that no one else has!

To learn more, and start your own recording system, and save a fortune in the process, see the link above.

In addition, to ensure you are always laser targeted, I always recommend the Success Strategies System as well.

For self performance reading improvement, I highly recommend the Self Help Database as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace


When it comes to your music, only the best will do. From the microphones to the sound cards, you want the highest quality equipment and software at the lowest possible price. There are many excellent home recording software programs on the market, each with its own unique benefits and uses.

Software Synthesizer

When it comes to home recording software, synthesizers are the nuts and bolts of the operation, valiantly stepping in where mere voice and live instrument recordings fall short. Spectrasonics Omnisphere meets every expectation and then some, with a variety of sounds, synthesis, and blending techniques.

Audio Editing Software

Sony’s Sound Forge is the ultimate editing software, leaving just one decision: should home recording studio owners choose the stripped down Sound Forge Audio Studio or splurge on Sound Forge 9? Sources say Sound Forge 9 is the best choice for serious editors, with everything you will need to master your tracks and sample other people’s.
Format Transfer Software

Acoustica Spin It Again is usually used for transferring analog formats to digital. It offers the best in clean up tools, making it easy to achieve professional quality without professional experience. Because this program is incredibly simple to use and inexpensive as well, it is a clearly good choice for home recording studios.

Instrumental Samples

Propeller Abbey Road Keyboards Reason Refill Pack offers a wide range of sounds, many of them keyboard sounds as the name would suggest. These are excellent for adding depth to an otherwise lackluster track. Although it is a refill pack, it offers a variety that could easily stand on its own.

Voice and Harmony Software

Antares Technologies Harmony Engine comes from a company that released the pitch correction feature that has become a staple at major recording studios all over the world. This harmony synthesizer is equally amazing, allowing users to create their own backup singing and harmonies without headaches. The sound quality is good enough to be classified as mind-blowing.

Although these are all excellent software packages, they are just a few of the many exceptional programs out there. Before purchasing you should know exactly what you want and what you can handle, so the software you choose is just perfect for you. Outfitting your home recording studio with high quality software is a crucial step to success, so this is a step that cannot be over thought.

Find out everything you need to know about the world of digital audio recording!

Visit Digital-Audo-Recording.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Dennis_Gal

Further Audio & Related Resources

Who else wants to learn to record voice information products at home?

Now you can easily do it with the packages & video tutorials that no one else has!

To learn more, and start your own recording system, and save a fortune in the process, see the link above.

In addition, to ensure you are always laser targeted, I always recommend the Success Strategies System as well.

For self performance reading improvement, I highly recommend the Self Help Database as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace


Mastering your finished audio product is considered somewhat of an art. There are mastering engineers that charge an awful lot of money to master your project for you. Depending on your situation this may be money well spent.

With the equipment available today you can do a decent job of mastering your project yourself if you are careful. Here are some things to consider when tackling the mastering stage yourself.

Dynamics: This is a very important step. Your music needs to breath and flow. You do not want to compress it so hard that it roars back at you. Find a good medium where your music has that fine line between volume and dynamics.

Eq: Your songs were probably recorded over a period of time therefore they most likely will have a slightly different feel to them. You need the songs to sound enough alike that they feel like they belong on the same CD. You don’t want the bass pumping loudly in one song and the next track finds the listener turning up the bass knob on his stereo. Try to get an even feel for the whole CD.

Same volume: The volume of each song needs to be similar. The general thought on this is you don’t want the person listening to your CD to have to turn the volume up or down. Your listener should be able to listen to your Cd at whatever volume they are comfortable with.

Order of songs: the order you choose for your songs is important. You need to be aware of the feel of each song. You want to take your listener on an emotional roller coaster and the order of the songs has everything to do with this ride.

Burn to Cd: The final and very important step is to burn your master to a Cd and listen to it on as many different types players as you can. Listen to it on everything from a cheap boom box to a high dollar stereo. Make sure it sounds good as it can on each one. The bass is especially troublesome to get right.

Be careful and take it a step at a time and you can come out with a decent master.

Doug Taylor has been creating audio online since 1999. If you think that putting audio files on a website will be a lot of hard work and hassle then download a free 16 page special report Mastering Streaming Audio [http://www.create-streaming-audio.com/csa_ezine.html]. Visit [http://www.create-streaming-audio.com/csa_ezine.html] for streaming audio tips, tricks, shortcuts, and techniques.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Douglas_Taylor

Further Audio & Related Resources

Who else wants to learn to record voice information products at home?

Now you can easily do it with the packages & video tutorials that no one else has!

To learn more, and start your own recording system, and save a fortune in the process, see the link above.

In addition, to ensure you are always laser targeted, I always recommend the Success Strategies System as well.

For self performance reading improvement, I highly recommend the Self Help Database as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace


These days it’s becoming more and more common for songwriters and bands to opt for a home recording solution over spending loads of cash in a commercial recording studio. Here’s one of the most important home recording tips I can give you: Take microphone techniques seriously. If you place your instruments and vocal microphone properly, you can easily produce recordings that rival those of the large recording studios. There are many common mistakes to be avoided when you’re just starting to produce music in your home studio. I talk about many of these in my Serve The Song blog.

One simple but crucial home recording mistake to avoid is microphone proximity effect. The definition of proximity effect as noted in Wikipedia is:

proximity effect in audio refers to a change in the frequency response of a directional microphone as the sound source is brought close to the microphone. The result of the change is a disproportionate increase in the bass response of the microphone.

In plain terms, if you mic your instrument or vocal too closely, you will end up with a distorted and bass-heavy recording. This only goes for directional microphones such as ones with a cardioid pickup pattern. There is nothing worse than laying down a killer take only to find that it’s all useless audio due to proximity effect distortion.

By the way- I’m not talking about the cool kind of edgy distortion you might find on heavier rock recordings. I’m talking about undesirable and super “boomy” bass-heavy distortion that says only one thing to the listener: This was done by an amateur.

Avoid Proximity Effect

Be sure to keep a healthy distance between your sound source and the microphone diaphragm. At least three to four inches of space should do the trick. Three to five inches of space will still provide the intimacy of close mincing an instrument. Farther than that will capture more of the room acoustics, which may or may not be desirable. A distance of under three inches runs the risk of causing proximity effect.

When recording vocals, it’s always a good idea to place a pop filter between the singer’s mouth and the microphone. While this will reduce unwanted pops and bursts of air, the pop filter alone will not necessarily reduce or avoid proximity effect. However, if you space your pop filter a couple inches away from the microphone diaphragm, then have the singer set up a couple inches away from the pop filter, you should be clear of proximity effect range.

Check out this article on how to record acoustic guitar. For more articles about song craft, music production techniques, and online music promotion visit Serve The Song.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Brian_Casel

Further Audio & Related Resources

Who else wants to learn to record voice information products at home?

Now you can easily do it with the packages & video tutorials that no one else has!

To learn more, and start your own recording system, and save a fortune in the process, see the link above.

In addition, to ensure you are always laser targeted, I always recommend the Success Strategies System as well.

For self performance reading improvement, I highly recommend the Self Help Database as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace


New scientific high-technology recording devices are used to bring the Word of God to people who might not otherwise have any way of hearing God’s Word. The result of this scientific technology on the Word of God is the audio Bible. There are various formats in which you will find the audio Bible available, including a Bible on audio CD and audio Bible mp3 formats, as well as Internet distribution by podcast. This technology also brings another benefit: it is highly portable, requiring only a small digital sound system connected to a computer. This means that recording of the Bible can occur anywhere in the world. The result of this ease of mobility is that there can be recording centers where the audio Bible is recorded in hundreds of different indigenous languages. People worldwide, who might not have any other means for reading and understanding the Bible, can now be exposed to the power of God’s Word in an audio version, which they can hear.

Digital recording provides clear, crisp audio, and is a preferred method for capturing sound. The basics of how it works is that a speaker reads the Bible into a microphone, which produces an analog signal. Then this signal is sent from the microphone to an analog to digital converter. This component’s job is to convert the analog signal into a binary code. This code is then sent through a bundle of transmitters, usually wires connected to the computer in the form of cables, and eventually ends in storage on the computer, often on a hard drive or a CD burner.

The beauty of digital recording is that any mistakes can be taken out by simply removing the exact part of the code stored on the computer, which makes for much more precise editing and cleaner sound as a result. During the editing process, music and sound effects can also be added, and are, in order to produce a final audio Bible version that is dramatized, and more compelling to listen to. You can have speakers from anywhere in the world recording their part of the final version, then sending it via the Internet to the mixing center, where all of the parts are combined together and edited to result in the final version of the audio Bible. Speakers who come from oral cultures can relate to drama very well, and this is an important aspect of the recordings that make the audio Bible so influential.

Lasers are used in the recording and playback of CDs. The laser burns tiny holes onto the CD’s surface. This allows a CD or DVD player to distinguish between parts of the disc that allow reflected weak laser light to permeate through holes and parts of the CD surface that do not, resulting in a reading of the digital data and playback through a speaker so that you can hear it. These are some methods used for audio Bible production, to share God’s Word worldwide.

Susan Slobac has worked professionally with audio recording technologies focused on audio Bible translations. In particular, she has been involved with a number of groups in recording audio Bible podcasts and believes strongly in making the audio Bible online a tool for ministry work. Due to the ease use Susan recommends the audio Bible mp3 and the Bible on audio CD for a variety of uses including audio Bible study sharing Bible stories with children.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Susan_Slobac

Further Audio & Related Resources

Who else wants to learn to record voice information products at home?

Now you can easily do it with the packages & video tutorials that no one else has!

To learn more, and start your own recording system, and save a fortune in the process, see the link above.

In addition, to ensure you are always laser targeted, I always recommend the Success Strategies System as well.

For self performance reading improvement, I highly recommend the Self Help Database as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace